12/20/2023 0 Comments Vacuum extractor![]() ![]() For the primary endpoint, the Vela was non-inferior to the Kiwi in both LUMC and CWZ. Results: A total of 47 participants were included in this study, of which three never achieved success with the Vela. Finally, the participants were asked for their opinions about the Vela in an open-ended question. Secondary endpoints were the total number of pop-offs of the cup, the exact success time within the successful traction window, the pumping time before the successful traction window, the satisfaction rate and the comparison between the two devices on placement, pumping and pulling. The primary endpoint was the traction window in which successful vacuum extraction occurred. During simulated “traction windows” of 25 seconds, the participant was allowed to pull. Methods: Obstetricians and residents from LUMC and CWZ hospitals performed a vacuum extraction on a birthing mannequin using both devices. This study compares this device, the VelaTM, with a commonly used vacuum extractor, the Kiwi Omnicup®, in terms of performance and user experience in a non-inferiority mannequin study. For this purpose, a novel reusable and affordable vacuum extractor was designed. Vacuum extraction is still little-used in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) compared to high-income countries, due to the lack of sufficient devices on the market that fit the local context. Meijer, Iris (TU Delft Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering)ĭrexhage, Dieuwertje (graduation committee)Ībstract-Background: Vacuum extraction is a way to prevent unnecessary maternal deaths, by using a vacuum extractor to help deliver the baby in the second stage of labour. Validation of a Novel Reusable Vacuum Extractor: a Comparative Mannequin Study between the Vela Vacuum Extractor and the Kiwi Omnicup ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |